A Price to Pay

Written by Preston Miller


The Canadian government’s ambitious $10/day childcare scheme, aimed at making childcare affordable for families nationwide, has sparked a heated debate among politicians, childcare providers, and families. The policy, designed to alleviate the financial burden on parents while ensuring children have access to quality early learning, is now under scrutiny for its unintended consequences and implementation challenges.


To support families and reduce the cost of childcare, the federal government launched a nationwide policy to cap daycare fees at $10 per day. Inspired by a similar approach in Quebec, this policy promised to make quality childcare accessible to all Canadian families (Government of Canada 2024). However, reports of operational difficulties from daycare providers and concerns over the policy’s sustainability have emerged, leading to a polarized discussion on its efficacy and impact (Derworiz 2024).

A recent news report highlighted the struggles faced by Ottawa daycare operators, indicating that the $10/day program might need to be revised, with warnings of potential closures due to financial constraints (Derworiz 2024). These challenges point to a broader debate on the balance between affordability, quality, and sustainability in childcare provision. To better understand the issue’s complexities, The Meliorist contacted our local MP and MLA for comments. We also requested a statement from the uLeth On-Campus Day Care; however, we received no response from our inquest.

Political Perspectives

In an analysis of the federal government’s $10/day childcare policy, Rachel Thomas (CPC), Member of Parliament for Lethbridge, shares her perspective on the policy’s impact. Thomas states that while the policy aims to make childcare more affordable, it has inadvertently increased financial burdens on childcare providers and families due to federal oversights and insufficient operator support. She explicitly cites, “The out-of-control spending of the federal government has caused inflation to skyrocket, thus driving up costs for childcare providers and the federally mandated cost control framework makes it extremely difficult to operate without making significant cutbacks.” Thomas indicates that Quebec’s previous struggles with a similar childcare program were overlooked, raising questions about why the federal government “ignored the warning signs and moved forward with [the policy].” She calls for a reassessment and renegotiation of the funding agreement to ensure the viability of childcare services and advocates for both federal and provincial engagement to address these challenges. Thomas’s response underscores a commitment to fiscal responsibility and policy reform to mitigate the adverse effects on Canadian families, aiming for a more equitable support framework for childcare providers (Rachel Thomas, email to The Meliorist, February 6, 2024).

Conversely, Shannon Phillips (NDP), a Member of the Legislative Assembly for Lethbridge-West, strongly criticizes the UCP government’s handling of childcare. Highlighting feedback from nearly 300 constituents, Phillips emphasizes the critical role of early childhood education and the frustration expressed through one-day childcare centre closures. She contrasts the situation in Alberta with other provinces that have made additional investments to support the federal childcare agreement, stating, “In other parts of the country, provincial governments provided additional investment to ensure the goals of the childcare agreement are met. In Alberta, the UCP government neglected to make any significant contribution towards the childcare subsidy program, leaving operators underfunded and unsupported.” This critique underscores the lack of provincial support under the UCP, impacting the sustainability of childcare operations. Phillips and her NDP colleagues pledge to advocate for a robust, well-funded childcare system that supports operators, children, and families, aiming to create a more inclusive and effective early childcare education system in Alberta, with a focus on ensuring adequate funding and operational support for childcare providers (Shannon Phillips, email to The Meliorist, February 13, 2024).


The diverging opinions of Thomas and Phillips shed light on the complex dynamics at play in the implementation of Canada’s daycare funding policy. While both politicians recognize the essential role of childcare in supporting families and enabling economic participation, their solutions reflect broader ideological differences regarding the roles of federal and provincial governments in social policy administration. Thomas’s call for federal reassessment and enhanced support for operators echoes Conservative concerns about fiscal responsibility and the impacts of national policies on local economies and communities. On the other hand, Phillips’s criticism of the UCP government’s handling of the agreement with Ottawa aligns with the NDP’s advocacy for increased public investment in social infrastructure to ensure equitable access to services like childcare.


As the debate over Canada’s daycare funding policy unfolds, the perspectives of Thomas and Phillips highlight the multifaceted challenges of implementing a one-size-fits-all policy across diverse provincial landscapes. The dialogue between federal intentions and regional realities, as well as between differing political ideologies, underscores the need for a nuanced approach to policy-making that considers the unique needs of communities and the importance of intergovernmental cooperation in addressing them.

For the students and broader community at the University of Lethbridge, the ongoing discussions around daycare funding offer a valuable case study in public policy, governance, and the tangible impacts of political decisions on everyday life. As the situation evolves, it will be crucial for all stakeholders to engage in constructive dialogue and seek solutions that balance affordability, quality, and sustainability in childcare services.


Derworiz, Colette. 2024. “Some Alberta Daycares Start ‘Rolling Closures’ to Protest $10-a-Day Program: Group.” The Canadian Press, January 30, 2024.

Government of Canada. 2024. “Toward $10-a-day: Early Learning and Child Care.” Employment and Social Development Canada. Last modified January 18, 2024. https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/campaigns/child-care.html.

Share this article:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *